In the late eighteenth century, the Industrial Revolution...

In the late eighteenth century, the Industrial Revolution made its debut in Great Britain and subsequently spread across Europe, North America and the rest of the world. These changes stimulated a major transformation in the way of life, and created a modern society that was no longer rooted in agricultural production but in industrial manufacture. Great Britain was able to emerge as the world’s first industrial nation through a combination of numerous factors such as natural resources, inventions, transport systems, and the population surge. It changed the way people worked and lived, and a revolution was started. As stated by Steven Kreis in Lecture 17, â€Å"England proudly proclaimed itself to be the Workshop of the World, a position that†¦show more content†¦Spinners, which were mostly men and weavers, were mostly women hired to work in factories instead of at home. The first innovation in cotton manufacture was the fly-shuttle. It speeded up the process of weav ing cotton threads into cloth. Even with this invention, cotton still had to be stretched out or spun into threads to begin with; this process was done slowly, one thread at a time, by a machine called a spinning wheel. This is where Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, which separated the seeds from the cotton fiber keeping cotton economically viable. Weaving was so much faster with flying shuttles that a yarn shortage soon developed. The spinning wheel at this time turned only a single spindle but inventors started designing machines to replace the spinning wheel. In 1764, James Hargreaves presented to his fellow inventors-the spinning jenny that turned several spindles at the same time. Yarn spun by a jenny was fine but too weak. Richard Arkwright’s Water Frame was invented in 1769, which was powered by water spun more cotton spindles all at once. England’s geography was perfect. England sits on vast quantities of coal, a carbon based mineral. Coal burns better and more efficiently than wood and, if you have lots of coal, it is substantially cheaper. The English figured out that they could replace wood with coal in the melting of metals, including iron, and went about digging coal from the ground.Show MoreRelatedImpact of Science on Society38427 Words   |  154 Pagestelevision writers, hosts, and producers. Born in Northern Ireland and educated at Oxford University, Burke spent 5 years in Italy teaching at the Universities of Bologna and Urbino and directing the English Schools in Bologna and Rome. He made his television debut in 1965 as a reporter for Granada Television’s Rome Bureau. Burke’s impressive following in the British Isles dates back t o 1966, when he joined the BBC’s weekly science show, Tomorrow’s World. As the chief BBC correspondent for all ApolloRead MoreImpact of Science on Society38421 Words   |  154 Pagestelevision writers, hosts, and producers. Born in Northern Ireland and educated at Oxford University, Burke spent 5 years in Italy teaching at the Universities of Bologna and Urbino and directing the English Schools in Bologna and Rome. He made his television debut in 1965 as a reporter for Granada Television’s Rome Bureau. Burke’s impressive following in the British Isles dates back t o 1966, when he joined the BBC’s weekly science show, Tomorrow’s World. As the chief BBC correspondent for all Apollo

Essay on The Finale of Evil in Orwells Shooting an Elephant

In â€Å"Shooting an Elephant,† Orwell faces a dilemma: whether or not to kill the elephant. With his final decision, the elephant finally lays dead in front of thousands of people. He explains that he was forced to shoot it because the Burmese people were expecting him to do that. In addition, he has to do it â€Å"to avoid looking like a fool† (14) in front of the crowd. At first glance, one would think that it makes sense for him to kill the elephant to save his face, but that was not the case. He effectively uses this incident to demonstrate the â€Å"real nature of imperialism† (3), where the elephant represents the British Empire. Orwell is ambivalent about the Burmese people. At the beginning of his essay, he recalls how Burmans treated him when†¦show more content†¦However, the crowd expects him to shoot it. They want to kill it not because it destroyed the bazaar, but rather, to enjoy the fun and to get the elephant meat. The crowd’s expe ctation leaves Orwell no choice but to shoot the elephant. He points out that he shot it to â€Å"impress the ‘natives’† (7). If he had not done it, the crowd would have laughed at him, and it would have hurt his pride as a white man living in the East. The elephant, in this case, represents imperialism. Orwell, being in the middle of imperialism and the Burmese people, does not want to destroy imperialism in the first place even though he did not like the way it treated the innocent Burmese people. However, seeing the elephant destroying Burmese’s homes and lives, he finally realizes what imperialism had done to the people of Burma. The Indian man who died represents the fact that Burmese people were defenseless against the British; they were poor and had neither the strength nor â€Å"the gut to raise a riot† (1) against imperialism regardless of how much they hated it. Even though he does not destroy imperialism like the way he did to the elephan t, he believed that it would be destroyed one day for the evil things that it has done. As illustrated by Orwell, the people of Burma, in killing the elephant, paint the picture for how they wanted imperialism to be killed. His reason for killing the elephant to look good in front of the crowd is simply an excuse for wanting to overturn

Deborah Tannen Analysis Essay Free Essays

Ap English Tannen Essay Section 1: Theory You Just Don’t Understand Women and Men in Conversation by Deborah Tannen is basically an explanation on how women and men converse. Tannens main goal is to give advice to the different genders in order for them to avoid as much conflict as possible. Tannen’s main ideas are to explain how differently women and men react to each other’s way of being. We will write a custom essay sample on Deborah Tannen Analysis Essay or any similar topic only for you Order Now It’s like they’re in their own little world while living in the same big world. Men tend to try to dominate situations and tend to always want to be at the top. Women do not tend to want to get into conflict but tend to show understanding. These big differences bring them into conflict. A Tannen explains, â€Å"What he wanted conflicted with what she wanted†. (40) Women and men are constantly clashing in opinions. Men are usually trying to be above each other which is something Tannen calls â€Å"one-up†. It is like men are always in competition with people around them. For example, in chapter 2, Tannen explains why men don’t ask for directions. She explains, â€Å"The fact that you have the information, and the person you are speaking to doesn’t, sends a metamessage of superiority. If reasons are inherently hierarchal, then the one who has more information is framed as higher up on the ladder, by virtue of being more knowledgeable and competent. † This shows how men are always trying to be at the top of every conversation. They want to know everything, in order to be at the top of everyone. Women have a completely different view point then men. They aim to be accepted by others, they try to avoid conflict, and they tend to show that they understand what the other person is trying to say. For example, in chapter 6, Tannen begins to explain how in a comic, the two boys are fighting while a girl named Debbie is trying to be the peacemaker. She claims that she is looking for someone but the boys say that the person isn’t there. Even though she knows the person is there, she acts like she doesn’t know anything to avoid conflict. Tannen explains, â€Å"Females play the role of being peace makers. †(162) This shows how women basically try to avoid any conflict with anyone. Section 2: Setting The setting of the conversation is at lunch in a restaurant for a reunion. There are three women: Cathy and Jeanne are sisters and Mary is their mom. The conversation is taking place at a restaurant called The Cheese Cake Factory at around 12:45. The women are having lunch because Cathy came down to visit them from Venezuela. The women haven’t seen each other in two months. They basically discuss their life styles and explain how their children act. Section 3: Analysis In this conversation, there are no men. Since there are only women, there is no conflict and they basically agree with each other in everything. They talk about their children’s behaviors and no one speaks more than one another. However, even though Mary does talk, she speaks less than her daughters do. The women only interrupt each other twice in the entire conversation but it is to add positive feedback to each of their issues. For example, Jeanne interrupts Cathy to say â€Å"of course†, when Cathy is talking about her conditions in Venezuela. Throughout the conversation, the topic basically stays the same. Unlike men, these women don’t try to be â€Å"one-up† from each other in anyway. No one brags about anything and they don’t try to put each other down. In fact, they agree with each other when they share different anecdotes. For example, Jeanne agrees with Mary when Mary says that it was hard to have 3 teenagers at once. Jeanne specifically says, â€Å"How the heck did you do that! † I think Tannens theory of women is proven by this conversation. Since there are just women, they each agree with each other and are very understanding of their concerns and opinions. Section 4: Reflection In this conversation, I completely agree with what Tannen would think of this conversation. Women always tend to agree with each other and then add feedback to the conversation. Also, men like to be straight to the point while women like to be detailed and concerned. This is exactly what the ladies are doing in this conversation. They do not try to be better than each other in any way; they are simply having lunch. No one tries to take the lead role of the conversation and neither one of them tries to act like they’re better than another. This book has opened my eyes to many things I never noticed. I never noticed why men and women clash so much with each other. Men and women are very different. For example, this book made me feel the need to analyze my parent’s relationship. They do fight because they have different views on how to deal with things. My mom seems to overreact to things in my dad’s eyes. However, my mom feels that my dad doesn’t care so much about her since he feels this way. I agree with her when she compares the genders. However, at times I felt that she would exaggerate. As a woman, I notice that I do many of the things she says in her book. I’m never looking for conflict and I don’t like to brag to people that I don’t really know because it seems like they’ll judge me. However, in this book, I feel that women look weak in her eyes. She feels that they are always willing to avoid conflict but this is not always the case. Women fight as well for what they want. At times, I felt her book had been inaccurate because the ideas were more stuck in the past. For example, the newspaper example in chapter 3. When I read this example, the first think I thought about was my grandparents. They always fight due to the idea of my grandpa always reading the paper rather than talking to my grandma. A lot of couples, nowadays, don’t have this problem. This to me shows that it’s inaccurate information. How to cite Deborah Tannen Analysis Essay, Essay examples

Sisterly Love Myth or not Essay Example For Students

Sisterly Love: Myth or not? Essay Your sister is a part of your essential self, an eternal presence of your heart and soul and memory. Susan CahillPatricia, Jessica and Janice are my sisters and great ones at that but today I will be focusing on the rather volatile relationship that my sister Patricia and I have endured over the past nineteen years, mainly in the past nine years. It is often said that a sibling relationship is based on that of genetic binding and a built in love like that of ones love for their parents,, Loving a sister is an unconditional, narcissistic, and complicated devotion that approximates a mothers lovesisters are inescapably connected, shaped by the same two parents, the same trove of memory and experience. (Bruno. M). With Patricia and I since we were children we have been the ones to fight the most and get along with each other the most, what I propose occurs within our relationship is that of a love/hate relationship, although more recently one based on contempt and anger. I wish to examine the decline in the relationship in terms of changing ideologies and social patterns along with a separation of identities. As a child I being the younger sister was in awe of Patricia my elder sister and would follow her around just trying to imitate her as best I could. Throughout my early teens and to this day I tend to compare myself to her in terms of friends, intelligence etc. Our sisters hold up our mirrors: our images of who we are and of who we can dare to become. (Fishel. E)But I no longer strive to imitate her every move, I have developed a life separate from her which is difficult to comprehend since through our entire lives we have shared the same room, gone to the same school even sharing the same birth month just one year and one week apart. With Patricias rather volatile temper and our evolving identities fights were inevitable. As Patricia once said to me , Rashell I feel like were drifting referring to me during the stages at university when my life began to take a different path away from my dependence on Patricia, as I gained a great deal more friends and a social life one Patricia and I couldnt relate on. But I did not leave her behind, as I gained a new lifestyle the time spent with Patricia did decrease she now had her friends and I had mine, this was a healthy occurrence, with slight negative aspects. It decreased if not eradicated our late night talks and simultaneously increased our arguments and disagreements. But when does a sibling fight overstep that line?We may fight, we may cryBut my love for you will never dieIll care for you until the endBecause you are my bestest friendCan such a statement like this ring true in reality? The fights I share with Patricia have become a common occurrence, starting off with a simple comment leading to declarations of hate and at time physical violence. When words of hate are uttered between sister many would assume it to be a heat of the moment comment but what if such fights took place almost daily could a hate for ones sisterbe developed to eclipse sisterly love? Sisters by chance, Friends by choice!If as Patricia has pointed out many a time you do not like your sister as a person could your love for your sister be constituted as a convention built into you by history and your parents or can it be said that a love for each other prevails over petty bickering, I must say I believe not in the latter for as my experience has shown, to love somebody you must love who they are, if that is not possible and your love is based on convention then the definition of love must be changed to more of an obligatory one. .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .postImageUrl , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:hover , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:visited , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:active { border:0!important; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:active , .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644 .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u155ee6deb059534c0893ecc945e9b644:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Harriet Tubman EssayOne aspect of my relationship with Patricia as my elder sister is her ability to read me and talk to me as though she were inside my head, as though we were one in the same entity, sharing an unexplainable bond one that transcends love and convention one that leads to late night talks and feelings of warmth and happiness in Patricias presence, To have a loving relationship with a sister is not simply to have a buddy or confidanteit is to have a soul mate for life. ( Secunda V)Patricia is more than a sister she is, to over use a clich,my best friend one that knows what shows make me laugh and what people make me cry a person who can tell my heart if brea king by simply looking at me, a person like Patricia or should I say a sister like Patricia is able to make things seem lighter upon your shoulders, things dont seem so scary or daunting once explained through her words and emotions, For there is no friend like a sister in calm or stormy weather, to cheer one on the tedious way, to fetch one if one goes astray, to lift one if one totters down, to strengthen whilst one stands. ( Rossetti C.). But has Patricias temper and ability to truly scar me emotionally severed my love or emotions towards her as my big sis ? The answer to that would be yes but to a certain extent, there are times when she makes me question myself with her bitter words and turn me to really think about her as a person no longer a sister and then there are times like when I wake up in the morning she tells me she loves me and to be safe and when I got out she rings me constantly to check on me. Some may construe that as a lack of trust on her part but I see it as her being the ultimate and true older sister that she is. No one knows better than a sister how we grew up, and who our friends, teachers, and favorite toys were. No one knows better than she. (Atkins D. V. ). There is a great respect for each other within our often unpredictable relationship even during our most vicious of fights when we compete as to whose words will inflict the most pain, which is a sadistic thing to engage in yet oddly commonplace in our fights. We know much about each other physically, mentally, emotionally, socially etc although Patricia doesnt tend to confide in me or share things with me as much as she does to her best friend Claudia. I on the other hand share everything from my daily activities to my inner most thought with Patricia because she is my confidant, one of few I would ever entrust my inner most thought with. You can not think how I depend on you, and when you are not there the colour goes out of my life (Woolf V. )I am not jealous of Claudia, as some may assume because I know that as much as I love and adore Patricia I know Claudia is better at helping her as I dont possess the empathy and warmth that Patricia does in dealing with other peoples emotion s. Some may interpret that as cold whereas I interpret it as a gift of helping others which I dont possess but Patricia does, I can try and I do to offer my opinion and help her with her emotions but I rarely succeed in a positive way on Patricias behalf. As I talk of Patricia and Is present relationship it takes me to the idea of our future one and how if ever it will come to be that of a healthy loving sibling relationship, personally I do not think for us that could be entirely healthy as fighting is a good way to express our emotions and thought although we do tend to cross the line. But I most definitely see a future for Patricia and I the true tragedy would be to not see one, It is said that when your parents die, you lose your past; when your spouse dies, you lose your present; and when your child dies, you lose your future. However, when your sibling dies, you lose your past, your present, and your future. After all, the relationship between siblings is potentially the longest of their lives. (http://www.geocities.com/tomthefreebird/siblingpage.html)To conclude I would like to say that although fights, scars (emotional and physical) have occurred constantly for the past few years and we have uttered words of hate against each other, a sisterly bond is on to be fought for, to be held on to at any cost, one that will make us better and more tolerant people